Date: 2010-01-08 06:47 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] austingoddess.livejournal.com
Rudy *didn't* mention 9/11 in a public speech of some kind? *faints*

Date: 2010-01-08 06:53 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] head58.livejournal.com
Or anthrax or the shoebomber or the guys in Seattle who were planning to blow up the space needle or Cat Stevens or...

Date: 2010-01-08 07:03 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] austingoddess.livejournal.com
I was laughing at the fact that RG was known for *never* missing an opportunity to mention 9/11 in his speeches and interviews...until now, when it suddenly would become a hindrance to making a (wrong) point.

Dems and Reps are just politicians, but the constant one-eye-squint twisting of facts by the latter, done in the manner of a preacher's kid who lights people's shoes on fire just to watch them jump, is really disgusting.

Date: 2010-01-08 07:11 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] harinezumi.livejournal.com
I still can't believe how much crap is being flung over some idiot who failed to set his pants on fire.

Date: 2010-01-08 10:31 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] maps-or-guitars.livejournal.com
I prefer "Christmas Taint Bomber" myself.

Date: 2010-01-08 07:28 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] cell23.livejournal.com
Shit, I fail to do that every damn day.

Date: 2010-01-08 07:31 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] head58.livejournal.com
Well, nearly every day.

Date: 2010-01-08 07:45 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] cell23.livejournal.com
Well, I say nearly. Pretty close, really.

Date: 2010-01-08 08:15 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rhipowered.livejournal.com
ext_7899: the tenth doctor stands alone (and i can kill you with my brain: Remy)
I can actually see why he might not have done so without being as epically hypocritical--the AP article I saw indicated that apparently the Repub strategy now is to insist that 9/11 happened on Clinton's watch and Bush just had to clean up. (Mary Matalin said something to that effect a few weeks ago on Meet the Press).

Which, you know, doesn't make much sense, as that would imply that what happened Christmas happened on Bush's watch, but since when...yeah.

Date: 2010-01-08 10:44 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] masteradept.livejournal.com
Revisionist history...

Date: 2010-01-08 06:55 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] harinezumi.livejournal.com
Guiliani? Forgetting about 9/11? What is the world coming to!?

Date: 2010-01-08 06:59 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] fallenlibrarian.livejournal.com
that man needs a muzzle.

Date: 2010-01-09 01:00 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] 11th-letter.livejournal.com
At the very least.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2010-01-08 08:43 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] verbena76.livejournal.com
Because bin Laden hates America and wouldn't want to do us any actual favors?

Date: 2010-01-08 09:15 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] grinninfoole.livejournal.com
You beat me to it. :)

Date: 2010-01-08 09:57 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] purpura.livejournal.com
...
I...
I...
I...

got nothing.

Date: 2010-01-08 11:35 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] retsuko.livejournal.com
... WHUT.

*head explodes*

Date: 2010-01-09 12:37 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] padparadscha.livejournal.com
Icon.

Profile

anagramofbrat: (Default)
anagramofbrat

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213 1415 16 17
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 08:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios